The Angry Future Expat

Navel Gazing – Happy Birthday U.S.A. Edition

Posted in debt by angryfutureexpat on July 4, 2010

The Angry Future Expat in America - Artist's Conception

As I sit here downing my whatever number Miller High Life and munching on some celebratory beef jerky and pretzels, I can’t help but ponder some of the things I’ll miss about the good ‘ole U.S. of A. on this, her 234th birthday.  Of course, the Grim Truth, is that I really won’t miss many of the most significant things about my homeland.  Here’s a few:

  • Jamie Dimon
  • Wells Fargo
  • Capital One/Richard Fairbank
  • The Pete Peterson Foundation/Pete Peterson
  • Debt
  • Stephen Schwarzman
  • Fat (like, Orca fat) People
  • Annoying Foursquare Facebook updates (Are you really that proud of your consumption habits?)
  • Obama
  • Larry Summers
  • Timmeh Geithner
  • The American News Media

But I’ll admit that there are things about the U.S. that are pretty fucking cool. Here are a few:

  • The First Amendment (Ironic, since our news media sucks)
  • Native English Speakers
  • Taco Bell (are they global yet?)
  • Miller High Life
  • Ummmm, other stuff too…probably

The simple fact is that the U.S. has gone off the rails.  But what’s different this time – and, of course, the U.S. has gone off the rails before – is the almost absolute inability of individuals to remake themselves.  We have a massive overlevering of American households, but no right to fail.  Collection company databases used to forget, but they don’t anymore.  As much as I love the Internet, a single ill-advised comment under your real name can doom you forever. Credit reports are necessary to get a job, and if you declare bankruptcy, everyone knows by typing the few letters that correspond with your name into Google.

In the U.S. the frontier is dead.  150 years ago, if you were a failure in Boston, you could move to St. Louis and try again.  And if you failed in St. Louis, move to San Francisco and try again.  And your debts?  Fuck ‘em, leave ‘em behind.

It may be nothing more than the inevitable result of the march of technology that the frontier dies, and the right to fail with it.  But I don’t quite believe that.  It’s just that the frontiers of opportunity aren’t in America anymore.

Happy Birthday.

Inspiring, Up-and-Coming Politician Cheats On Wife. In Other News, Dog Bites Man.

Posted in debt, Financial "Reform" by angryfutureexpat on May 1, 2010

Drudge is pimping some idiotic story about how Obama had an affair with one of his staffers back in 2004.  True?  Probably.  Do I give a shit?  I would have a hard time caring less.  I have my own reasons for disliking Obama: the health care “reform” bill; letting Timmeh and Larry Summers near the levers of power; the joke of a financial “reform” package that he’s pushing; opening up offshore drilling (nice timing BTW!); etc. etc. etc.  In all honesty, if this cheating story turns out to be true, I might have a little more respect for him – at least I’ll know that he’s not a complete zero.

People are flawed, in fact pretty much everybody is completely fucked up in one way or another.  It’s human nature, it’s always been that way, and it will always be that way – not a goddamn thing we can do to change it.  But there are things that, as a society we can do to make lives better.  For example, I’m all for a broad social safety net, and I think that Social Security and Medicare are, for the most part good programs.

But there is one function of government that it even more important: standing against the forces of oligarchy and their attempts to skim, steal, or otherwise plunder the national wealth.  Teddy Roosevelt knew that, so did Franklin Roosevelt.  But for decades, the United States has not had anybody pulling the levers of political power on behalf of the real lower and middle classes – which I define as about the bottom 95% of the income distribution.  Instead, the goal of the political elites has been to increase the “financialization” of the economy – which is just a cute term for blowing debt-financed asset bubbles and increasing household leverage (aka debt).

Have no illusions, that is real and vicious class warfare against the poor and the middle class.  While what’s been going on is obvious to those paying attention, Wall Street’s utter contempt for real people now has been put to paper (or pixel) in an angry little screed that’s making the rounds on Wall Street:

We are Wall Street. It’s our job to make money. Whether it’s a commodity, stock, bond, or some hypothetical piece of fake paper, it doesn’t matter. We would trade baseball cards if it were profitable. I didn’t hear America complaining when the market was roaring to 14,000 and everyone’s 401k doubled every 3 years. Just like gambling, its not a problem until you lose. I’ve never heard of anyone going to Gamblers Anonymous because they won too much in Vegas.

Well now the market crapped out, & even though it has come back somewhat, the government and the average Joes are still looking for a scapegoat. God knows there has to be one for everything. Well, here we are.

Go ahead and continue to take us down, but you’re only going to hurt yourselves. What’s going to happen when we can’t find jobs on the Street anymore? Guess what: We’re going to take yours. We get up at 5am & work till 10pm or later. We’re used to not getting up to pee when we have a position. We don’t take an hour or more for a lunch break. We don’t demand a union. We don’t retire at 50 with a pension. We eat what we kill, and when the only thing left to eat is on your dinner plates, we’ll eat that.

For years teachers and other unionized labor have had us fooled. We were too busy working to notice. Do you really think that we are incapable of teaching 3rd graders and doing landscaping? We’re going to take your cushy jobs with tenure and 4 months off a year and whine just like you that we are so-o-o-o underpaid for building the youth of America. Say goodbye to your overtime and double time and a half. I’ll be hitting grounders to the high school baseball team for $5k extra a summer, thank you very much.

So now that we’re going to be making $85k a year without upside, Joe Mainstreet is going to have his revenge, right? Wrong! Guess what: we’re going to stop buying the new 80k car, we aren’t going to leave the 35 percent tip at our business dinners anymore. No more free rides on our backs. We’re going to landscape our own back yards, wash our cars with a garden hose in our driveways. Our money was your money. You spent it. When our money dries up, so does yours.

The difference is, you lived off of it, we rejoiced in it. The Obama administration and the Democratic National Committee might get their way and knock us off the top of the pyramid, but it’s really going to hurt like hell for them when our fat a**es land directly on the middle class of America and knock them to the bottom.

We aren’t dinosaurs. We are smarter and more vicious than that, and we are going to survive. The question is, now that Obama & his administration are making Joe Mainstreet our food supply…will he? and will they?

This isn’t some trader “going rogue,” these guys actually believe this shit.  Read, and then re-read this email, it’s all here, the “we work so much harder than you mentality,” “we make your summers off and landscape businesses possible,” “we push up the value of your 401k,” the fundamental misunderstanding of what real people make, I mean seriously, does anyone get double time and a half?  In the real world 85k is a hell of a lot of money, or at least it would be if serial killer Alan Greenspan hadn’t caused household debt levels to spike to unheard of levels.  That’s what made Wall Street’s go-go years possible.  Robert Reich get’s to the heart of the problem:

The paper entrepreneurs are winning out over the product entrepreneurs.

Paper entrepreneurs — trained in law, finance, accountancy — manipulate complex systems of rules and numbers. They innovate by using the systems in novel ways: establishing joint ventures, consortiums, holding companies, mutual funds; finding companies to acquire, “white knights” to be acquired by, commodity futures to invest in, tax shelters to hide in; engaging in proxy fights, tender offers, antitrust suits, stock splits, spinoffs, divestitures; buying and selling notes, bonds, convertible debentures, sinking-fund debentures; obtaining government subsidies, loan guarantees, tax breaks, contracts, licenses, quottas, price supports, bailouts; going private, going public, going bankrupt.

Product entrepreneurs — engineers, inventors, production managers, marketers, owners of small businesses — produce goods and services people want. They innovate by creating better products at less cost.

Our economic system needs both. Paper entrepreneurs ensure that capital is allocated efficienctly among product enrepreneurs. But paper entrepreneurs do not directly enlarge the economic pie. They only arrange and divide the slices. They provide nothing of tangible use. For an economy to maintain its health, entrepreneurial rewards should flow primarily to product, not paper.

And our public policy, for decades, has been committed to ensuring that the pushers of paper, not the developers of products, are not only able, but actually entitled to skim an increasing percentage of the income and wealth of the nation. Not only is the government failing in its most fundamental role of stopping this, it has been enabling and actively encouraging it for decades.  Take a look at this chart which shows that the profits of the financial sector versus the non-financial sector began diverging in the mid-80s, accelerated radically around 2000, crashed back to Earth during 2008, and under Obama’s guidance, spiked back up during 2009.

It is fundamentally backward.  Finance serves one, and only one, purpose and that is to allocate capital in the real economy.  But protecting the finance industry, and encouraging people to leverage themselves and increase household debt levels has become an end in itself, as if there is no real economy, just pushing debt around.  Hey, here’s an $8,000 tax credit so you can overpay for some piece of shit exurban tract house! Praise be consumer credit is finally ticking upward!

So to help the banks, the government encourages as much household debt as possible, but then turns around and doubly fucks us when things go bad.  We have to make it a huge and expensive pain in the ass for consumers to discharge their debt is bankruptcy because otherwise it would be bad for the finance companies!  Much better to allow them to garnish 25% of the wages to pay off the collection companies, even if the supposed “debt” was (miraculously) discharged in bankruptcy, or, hell, never existed in the first place!

Despite owning Congress, getting absolutely every legislative and regulatory blow job possible for 3 decades, these guys pitch a hissy fit at even the most trivial and ultimately useless attempt to reign in some of the worst abuses. I mean, Jesus fucking Christ, if there was any justice in this country 90%+ of the executives on Wall Street would be sitting in prison sleeping with one eye open, but instead we get weak tea “reform” proposals, and another wholesale screw job for the bottom 95% of the income distribution.

With Obama as President (or Bush I and II, Clinton, and Reagan for that matter) you don’t need to imagine what it’s like to live in a banana republic ruled by a handful of oligarchs.  You’re living it.

Slightly Updated

Why I Like The Tea Partiers Even Though I Could Never Support Their Movement

Posted in debt, General Interest by angryfutureexpat on April 18, 2010

It has become almost de riguer among the those of us on the left to identify racism as the core of the tea party movement.  Before I go much further, no matter what your feeling about the movement, you have to admit that the “Teabagger” branding was an incredibly impressive bit of marketing – if you want a study in competitive branding, look at how the blogs managed to kick the teabagger meme into the mainstream – pretty amazing.  But I digress, let me just add that I have no special insight into the movement, but if you look at one of the comments that gets frequently cited for the racism idea, I’m pretty sure it doesn’t show, what a lot of people think it shows:

Jerry Johnson, 58, a lawyer from Berryville, Va., who held a homemade sign depicting the United States as the Titanic striking an iceberg.

“I came here because of what I see going on in this country,” he said. “We’re bankrupt in America. We can’t run our households like the government’s running the country. That, and the idea of people [sitting] around on their butts. Fifty percent of the people collecting a check are paying no taxes, while the other 50 pull the wagon.”

Johnson continued: “Normally I’m not a protester. I’ve got other things to do in life. I’d rather be doing all kinds of other things. But I just can’t stand by and watch this country go down the tubes.”

He said he “worked my way up from nothing” and was not about to allow “somebody else to reach in my pocket and just take it away and give to somebody” who does nothing.

Johnson expressed opposition to Obama. “It’s not just because he’s black,” he said. “I wish I could tell you that I loved this guy, that he was a great president, that I had faith in him. But I have none. Zero.”

It’s entirely possible that Jerry Johnson is an utterly racist asshole – his analysis of taxation rates certainly suggests he’s an idiot – but I think (without knowing) that the “just because he’s black” comment is coming from somewhere else.  I suspect that it’s paranoia  about the “teabagger” branding.  He, and I suspect many of the Tea party crowd are scared at how successful the teabagger meme was at infiltrating the discourse, and they’re worried that the racism meme could also stick.  I view Johnson’s statement not so much as an unintended bit of honesty, but rather as an awkward (really awkward and ineffective!) attempt to defuse the racism meme that he’s worried is building.

That’s a somewhat long-winded way of introducing my basic point which is that my take is that racism is not what is driving the tea party movement.  I also don’t think that, for the most part, it’s government spending.  I think it is shear, unmitigated terror at the their own (real, potential, or even imagined) downward mobility.

For the most part, the teaparties are just like the majority of Americans:

Their responses are like the general public’s in many ways. Most describe the amount they paid in taxes this year as “fair.” Most send their children to public schools. A plurality do not think Sarah Palin is qualified to be president, and, despite their push for smaller government, they think that Social Security and Medicare are worth the cost to taxpayers. They actually are just as likely as Americans as a whole to have returned their census forms, though some conservative leaders have urged a boycott.

But here’s where the kicker comes in.  They’re not rich, but they do pretty well relative to the rest of society:

They are far more pessimistic than Americans in general about the economy. More than 90 percent of Tea Party supporters think the country is headed in the wrong direction, compared with about 60 percent of the general public. About 6 in 10 say “America’s best years are behind us” when it comes to the availability of good jobs for American workers.

Nearly 9 in 10 disapprove of the job Mr. Obama is doing over all, and about the same percentage fault his handling of major issues: health care, the economy and the federal budget deficit. Ninety-two percent believe Mr. Obama is moving the country toward socialism, an opinion shared by more than half of the general public.

****

Tea Party supporters over all are more likely than the general public to say their personal financial situation is fairly good or very good. But 55 percent are concerned that someone in their household will be out of a job in the next year. And more than two-thirds say the recession has been difficult or caused hardship and major life changes. Like most Americans, they think the most pressing problems facing the country today are the economy and jobs.

I think that finding is much more important than any other finding in that poll.  It is concern that there won’t be jobs, that the government is somehow going to come in and take the savings and security they’ve managed to build up and give it to people that don’t want to work, which will make it impossible for people who want to work to find jobs.  It’s a fundamental uncertainty about the future that is driving these people.

Now, as anyone who’s read much of my blog should know, they’re right to be worried – the reasons, or more accurately the articulated reasons, are all fucked up – but we’re in a long-term secular decline in this country.  And people should be angry about that, really, really, angry.  And I’ll take anger about the direction of the country, wherever I can get it.  Thus, I am glad to see the Tea Party movement, and I encourage them to stay out there, waving their signs around and getting pissed about the direction of the country.

Of course, while I think the underlying reasons for the tea party movement are right, I also think that the policies that they say they want are massively fucked up, so you won’t be finding me at any rallies.  Indeed, I really doubt that I could ever throw in with any group where:

The percentage holding a favorable opinion of former President George W. Bush, at 57 percent, almost exactly matches the percentage in the general public that holds an unfavorable view of him.

Yikes.  Double yikes on the T-shirt.  But keep it up all, I won’t say anything (or at least much) bad about you.

Come and Get Me – Mortgage and Student Loan Edition

Posted in banksters, debt by angryfutureexpat on March 28, 2010

I’ve been saying for a while that the most profound political statement you can make is to simply stop sending the banks your debt service payments. If you don’t pay, they may come for you – and will – but if we all don’t pay, they need to pay attention. The mortgage market is the best example of where this strategy has been 1) implemented on a wide scale, and 2) is in the very early stages of being somewhat effective.

This chart from Clear on Money, which is also posted at the The Big Picture, is an example of the “they can’t get us all” phenomenon.  There is a very compelling wedge between those mortgages that are “seriously delinquent” and both Foreclosures in Process and Foreclosure starts.  With the solid lines, it’s a little bit difficult to compare them because one is a stock variable, while the other is a flow variable, but there seems to be an inverse correlation between increases in the category of seriously delinquent and foreclosure starts and foreclosures in process.  In other words, when the rate of increase in delinquency slows, then the banks are able to play “catch-up” and get the ball rolling with more foreclosures.

If you look at some of the underlying data from the report (.pdf) out of the Office of Thrift Supervision it also shows that an increase in delinquency is not matched by an increase in foreclosures.

If you run the numbers, what it shows is a pretty pronounced divergence from the end of 2008 to the end of 2009.  A mortgage generally cannot be foreclosed on for at least 90 days, so that is most relevant category, and at the end of 2008 the percentage of foreclosures in process relative to 90+ delinquency was 81.7%.  By the end of 2009, that percentage had dropped to 67.3%.  Delinquency is simply outstripping the ability of the banksters to pull the trigger on foreclosure. To those of you out there that are foreclosing on that overpriced debt trap (strategically or otherwise), I say “nice work.”  Your efforts are beginning, only beginning, to have an effect.

Here’s how we know (.pdf).

To expand the use of principal write-downs, servicers will be required to consider an alternative modification approach that emphasizes principal relief. This alternative modification approach will include incentive payments for each dollar of principal write-down by servicers and investors. The principal reduction and the incentives will be earned by the borrower and lender based on a pay-for-success structure.

The government is trying to create an incentive for the reduction in the amount of debt owed by real people.  Now, don’t get me wrong, the plan as announced is a joke and won’t accomplish anything, but it represents a significant cognitive shift among our political and financial betters that they are even willing to consider debt reduction.

What prompted this post was a poll that Rob put up over at his student loan forgiveness blog.  The poll suggests various forms of protest that can be used to agitate for student loan principal reduction including suicide, moving out of the country, and withholding payments.  Now, far be it from me to try to talk anyone out of moving out of the country (I’m leaving soon too) or even offing themselves (not a fan, but whatever), but the mortgage market is starting to show some signs that widespread default really can have a political effect.

I’ve said all along that there needs to be a wholesale debtors’ revolt and refusal to send payments to banks and other finance companies.  The housing market collapsed more than 3 years ago, and we are just beginning to see our political betters wake up to the reality that mortgage debt which cannot be paid won’t be.

So, make a political statement, keep more of what you earn, and in the end get rid of your debt, hopefully.

World’s Biggest Assholes Watch

Posted in Asshole Watch by angryfutureexpat on March 25, 2010

Welcome back for this week’s edition of the World’s Biggest Assholes Watch, where we keep tabs on the comings and goings of the World’s Biggest Assholes™.  In this week’s edition we answer the questions that have kept you on the edge of your seat for the last week:  Has hack Charlie Gasparino become an even bigger hack?  Is Goldman Sachs developing a vampire squid edition of the Aristocrats?  Is it possible that Jamie Dimon is one the 50 biggest anythings other than assholes?  No way to know without reading further – so without further adieu…

Capital One and its shitbag CEO Richard Fairbank are offering customers advice on how they should use their tax refund to further their financial goals.  That’s funny, just last week I got a letter from Capital One suggesting that I sign my tax refund over to their collections department, and that’s utterly inconsistent with my financial goals.  Ironic.  My advice: find a credit union, stiff Capital One, and move out of the U.S. – or perhaps I’m projecting.

Jamie Dimon is not only an asshole, he’s also one of Businessweek’s 50 most important people in real estate.  Way to go Jamie!  I trust it’s just a coincidence that new home sales hit a record low last month.  I was not surprised to find out that Jamie Dimon is a fan of mountain top removal mining – and for that you really have to be an asshole – and some people from West Virginia aren’t to happy about his company’s role.  They’re erecting mud mountains in Manhattan with a letter to Jamie on top asking him to withdraw JP Morgan’s support for MTR mining.

Might work if Jamie Dimon had a soul, but since he doesn’t, I’ll just say good luck guys.   Paul Krugman, who I often like, claims that Jamie Dimon was right about there being a financial crisis every 5-7 years (Krugman “examines” 1870-1933 and claims no crisis again until 2007).  I remember at least the Latin American debt crisis of the 80s, the S&L crisis, the Mexican meltdown of 1994, and the Long-Term Capital Management fiasco in 1998.  For defending, even if only tongue-in-cheek, a huge asshole, and especially for doing it with erroneous data, Paul Krugman is an honorary World’s Biggest Asshole™ this week.  Lastly, JP Morgan’s “research” arm issued a report blaming unemployment insurance for high and prolonged unemployment.  Jamie, not sure if you greenlighted this nonsense, but it still proves you are an asshole.

Goldman Sachs is not only the poster child for evil, but it also stands as a pro-nepotism bulwark against meritocracy.  Turns out that both of the junior Blankfein boys have worked at daddy’s shop.  One of them, a recent college grad, made$155,000 last year – real money for a kid that doesn’t have to tithe any of it to Sallie Mae.  The other junior Blankfein is writing  his Harvard senior thesis on the pre-FDIC insurance system.  Hey, you need to know the history of bailouts to engineer them successfully.

Looks like Goldman execs like to keep their families around, which leads us to conclude that Goldman Sachs executives are trying to perfect the Aristocrats routine (Vampire Squid Edition):

Or maybe we’re just cynical.  But Goldman Sachs cares about mentioned its public perception, designating adverse publicity as a “major risk factor” in an SEC filing – of course if they weren’t so dependent on suckling at the public teat, adverse publicity among the rubes wouldn’t really be a problem would it?  Me?  I think they’re just assholes.  But hack Charlie Gasparino who was out ginning up sympathy about Lloyd Blankfein’s hate mail last week, now claims Lloyd was not due $9,000,000.00 in 2009, but rather $100,000,000.00 – pretty hacky Charlie.  Kind of an asshole move by Blankfein to send Charlie out to say it, but Charlie works for Fox Business now, so he doesn’t have to worry about little things like “accuracy” or “credibility.”

Asshole Timmeh Geithner had a busy week chatting up the AEI, Congress, and just about everyone else.  But Timmeh, I’m going to leave you out of this week’s edition, because you’re such an asshole you’ve already said something retarded enough that I could write an entire post about it.  So, give it up for Timmeh who will, no doubt, make a triumphant return as one of the World’s Biggest Assholes™ next week.

I haven’t been able to find out much about Stephen Schwarzman recently which I find irritating since I’m sure that if he’s breathing he’s acting like an asshole.  If anyone has the scoop on what’s up with Steve-o, drop me a line or post it in the comments.

A special shout out this week to President Obama, who managed to push through his health bill which requires just about everyone, without regard to debt service or other payment  obligations, to spend somewhere between 8 and 15%+ of their income on health insurance and out of pocket expenses.  The bill simultaneously imposes minimal limitations on health insurers, lets them keep their antitrust exemption, and includes no public plan to keep them honest.  Only a true asshole could come up with something that was that big a clusterfuck, so President Obama we are awarding you our Asshole of the Week Trophy™.  Congratulations Mr. President!

Until next week.

Bailouts 4eva! Health Care Edition

Posted in General Interest by angryfutureexpat on March 22, 2010

Here at AFEP we don’t limit ourselves to debt, the destruction of the working classes, and the shenanigans of the motherfuckers on Wall Street. We’re a Renaissance blog! We’re happy to discuss any issue that represents the wholesale ratfucking of the American people. With that in mind, we discuss the new health care “reform” bill recently passed by the House and Senate and headed for Obama’s desk. To know whether or not this is a good deal for the American people, you need look no further than this headline:

Stocks rally as health care shares rise

The broad-based bill will extend coverage to 32 million more people, require all Americans to have coverage and will prevent companies from denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions. Medicare prescription drug coverage will be expanded and people will be given subsidies to help pay for insurance.

The bill is expected to cost $940 billion over ten years. (For highlights of the plan, click here.)

Health care stock movers: Dow pharmaceutical stocks Merck (MRK, Fortune 500) and Pfizer (PFE, Fortune 500) both rallied around 2%. Hospital operators advanced as well, as they are seen benefiting from the increased number of customers. Tenet Healthcare (THC, Fortune 500) gained more than 7% and Community Health Systems (CYH, Fortune 500) rallied 4%.

Yup, whatever garbage was being spread around about how the health insurers didn’t want the Obama health plan to pass was just so much shadow boxing and bullshit.  The stock market speaks the truth.  Tens of millions of new captive customers, forced to buy insurance from companies that maintain their antitrust exemption, and face no real competition from a government plan, e.g. Medicare buy-in or public option.

This plan is nothing but the wholesale transfer of wealth from the middle class (via the treasury) to the health insurers enforced by the world’s biggest and most aggressive collection agent – no, not Sallie Mae – the IRS.  Sound familiar?  It is eerily similar to TARP, TALF, free money from the Fed, and non-recourse loans backed by Toxic waste at par.  And what, you ask will the presently uninsured be getting for their insurance payments and government subsidies?

Here’s a story from commenter soulmatic09 over at the Big Picture:

A few years back, I fell and broke my jaw on vacation. I went to the ER via an ambulance on a Thursday afternoon, and am finally admitted as an inpatient to have surgery at about 1 AM.

After waiting all day Friday to hear from a doctor, they waited until 5 pm that day to tell me that hospital does not do jaw surgery. (Then why did ER guys admit me?) Not only that, the doctors offices were all closed at 5pm, so I had to wait in a hospital bed until Monday to a surgeon. No big deal, I figure they transfer me to the right hospital, have me eat pudding for a few days, I get my jaw fixed, and I go home.

Monday comes around, nothing. Tuesday comes around and the surgeon shows up. “There’s a problem,” he tells me: “Your insurance company won’t approve this b/c they say it’s a dental procedure.”

I’m like “WTF?!?! My jawbone is considered a tooth? What kind of messed up anatomy books are you guys using?” He tells me that he didn’t understand it either, and were working on getting the approval.

I spend the rest of the week in the hospital, getting moved from room to room waiting for this simple surgery to be approved by HealthNet.

By the end of the week, I am absolutely fuming, as is the surgeon. Keep in mind, this was my vacation, and I was due back days ago. My broken jaw is starting to set, and eventually the surgeon says “Screw it, I’m doing the surgery. We’ll figure out how to pay for it later.” And I had health insurance!

I finally get the surgery done, and get the bill: $30,000. And you know what the bulk of the bill was? Inpatient services for being in the hospital for over a week and a half, which was the result of them rejecting the procedure day after day!

I spent the next six months trying to get them to pay the bills; I was 25 years old & didn’t have $30k lying around. After getting them to realize my mandible isn’t a tooth, they denied the claim because of geography. (I lived in Glendale, CA, but had the operation in Glendale, AZ. They tried to say I had no coverage in Arizona, but my emergency coverage clearly stated it applies in all 50 states. Then they said my claim got screwed up because the name of the cities were the same.)

Then I had to contest each claim one by one (the stack of claims was over 1 inch thick) but I finally got them to pay for it.

There’s actually more to the story I don’t want to get into, but how on earth someone could say this is the greatest health system in the world?

Multiply that story by 50 million, and that’s what we just bought.  All for the bargain price of 940 billion.

Heckuva job Obama!

At least they have socialized medicine in Costa Rica.  Not sure if it’s available to expats though.  Need to look into that.

Update: This FDL chart explains some of the key provisions and generally why the bill sucks.

View this document on Scribd

Obama Like Tiger, America Like Tiger’s Wife Says Pawlenty

Posted in banksters, debt by angryfutureexpat on February 19, 2010

Now, I’m no fan of Obama’s, but I think the much more appropriate analogy is that the banksters are like Tiger, and America is like Tiger’s wife.

Promised a bright future if we would hook up with them? Check!

Increase your marketability by taking out student loans to enhance your human capital.  Thanks Sallie Mae!

Get a piece of the American dream with a zero down, no doc mortgage with a variable interest rate.  Thanks Countrywide!

Earn cash back by using your 0% introductory rate credit card for food, child care, and health insurance. Thanks Chase and Capital One!

And just like Elin, we find out that the banksters were running around behind our backs, lobbying Congress to make it next to impossible to discharge the debt in bankruptcy, jacking up interest rates for picayune reasons, running various two cycle billing scams, losing payments, and doing everything they could so it would be next to impossible to get out from under the mountain of debt.

So yeah, Obama sucks, but the banksters wrote the book on how to fuck us over.

Saturday Youtube

Posted in banksters by angryfutureexpat on February 13, 2010

First up is my hypothetical conversation between Barack Obama and Larry Summers where Larry explains the logic behind the bank bailouts.  The extranormal voices are a little grating, but I think it’s worth watching:

Next up, a classic from the angry guy genre.  I think he’s wrong about a few of his points, but at least he’s pissed and willing to take it out with a baseball bat.  Too bad Blankfein wasn’t in the room:

And this one from the always worthwhile Dylan Ratigan, with a title that is just great – Banksters Are Just Like the Drug Cartel.  Amen to that:

Obama Doesn’t “Begrudge” Bankster Bonuses – I Would Like to See Them Suffer Repeated Prison Rape

Posted in banksters by angryfutureexpat on February 11, 2010

Always the diplomat and apparently worried that banksters are feeling “buyers remorse” about their purchase of the Democratic Party lock, stock, barrel, Obama has come riding to the defense of Jamie Dimon’s 17 million dollar bonus and Lloyd Blankfein’s 9 million dollar bonus:

Q Let’s talk bonuses for a minute: Lloyd Blankfein, $9 million; Jamie Dimon, $17 million. Now, granted, those were in stock and less than what some had expected. But are those numbers okay?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, look, first of all, I know both those guys. They’re very savvy businessmen. And I, like most of the American people, don’t begrudge people success or wealth. That’s part of the free market system. I do think that the compensation packages that we’ve seen over the last decade at least have not matched up always to performance. I think that shareholders oftentimes have not had any significant say in the pay structures for CEOs.

Q Seventeen million dollars is a lot for Main Street to stomach.

THE PRESIDENT: Listen, $17 million is an extraordinary amount of money. Of course, there are some baseball players who are making more than that who don’t get to the World Series either. So I’m shocked by that as well. I guess the main principle we want to promote is a simple principle of “say on pay,” that shareholders have a chance to actually scrutinize what CEOs are getting paid. And I think that serves as a restraint and helps align performance with pay. The other thing we do think is the more that pay comes in the form of stock that requires proven performance over a certain period of time as opposed to quarterly earnings is a fairer way of measuring CEOs’ success and ultimately will make the performance of American businesses better.

Well, thanks, fucko.

These cocksuckers brought the economy to its knees and have ladled debt onto the middle class to a level unheard of in history.  They are the reason people can’t buy.  They are the reason the economy is in the toilet.  They are the fucking reason that businesses (small businesses, natch!) are dying by the bushel.

I say, instead of giving them multi-million dollar bonuses, they should be sent to Guantanamo Bay.  If you compare the damage done to the global economy by the “financial services” industry relative to the terrorists that knocked down the Twin Towers, it’s not even close.  Even in terms of lost lives, I’d be willing to bet we’ll see well more than 3,000 “excess deaths” from the millions that have lost or will lose their health insurance because of the Dimon/Blankfein depression.

Keep Guantanamo Bay open, let the terrorists go, and make Blankfein and Dimon new prisoners #1 and #2.

My candidate for prisoner #3 is whatever genius came up with this idea:

Credit specialists at Citi are considering launching the first derivatives intended to pay out in the event of a financial crisis. The firm has drawn up plans for a tradable liquidity index, known as the CLX, on which products could be structured that allow buyers to hedge a spike in funding costs.

****

However, there is concern from academic circles that the counterparty risks involved in such a product could create moral hazard.  Chris Rogers, chair of statistical science at Cambridge University, said the only participants able to sell CLX-based products would probably be those who are too big to fail.

Who’s the counterparty, you ask?  It’s pretty much guaranteed to be governments, central banks, and taxpayers all over the world.  Talk about a sophisticated looting instrument!

Motherfuckers.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

//

Citigroup Plans “Crisis Derivatives”

Proving that it has learned nothing from the arrogance of Chuck Prince and Citi’s subsequent demise, Citi plans crisis derivatives.

Credit specialists at Citi are considering launching the first derivatives intended to pay out in the event of a financial crisis. The firm has drawn up plans for a tradable liquidity index, known as the CLX, on which products could be structured that allow buyers to hedge a spike in funding costs.

Like the untraded US rates liquidity index (USRLI), the CLX is constructed as a sum of the Sharpe ratio – deviations from the mean divided by volatility – of various market factors, such as equity volatilities, Treasury rates, swap spreads, corporate bond swaption-implied volatilities, and structured credit spreads. Citi will make the CLX tradable by using fixed historical values for the mean and volatility parameters, eliminating the need for costly recomputation from lengthy time series.

Although the design of the index serves as a proxy measure for liquidity, Terry Benzschawel, a managing director of quantitative credit trading strategy at Citi in New York and head of the team researching the product, says it also tracks more traditional measures such as bid-ask spreads, trading volumes and the USRLI. He compares the potential impact of CLX to that of the interest rate swaps market.

“The great thing about the index is that it hedges your funding costs while being very simple to trade. I believe it will reduce the systemic risk in the industry, akin to how the advent of swaps means people don’t worry about interest-rate exposures any more – they just pay a fee to hedge it,” he says.

Chris Rogers, chair of statistical science at Cambridge University, said the only participants able to sell CLX-based products would probably be those who are too big to fail.

“This is basically a kind of insurance product. The main issue is: how good is the party issuing it? If it’s going to be paying out huge numbers in the event of a crisis, will it be able to meet it obligations? Insurers can buy reinsurance for their liabilities, but the buck has to stop somewhere – there’s a limit to how much a private insurer can pay out. Only the government can cover unlimited losses,” he says.

The last thing we need is another product few will understand, and fewer still use for actual hedging rather than speculation.

Don’t we have enough derivatives already?

Please remember there always has to be someone on the other side of the trade. Think everyone will be hedged properly? I don’t. In fact I guarantee you they won’t.

This product will be offered by those too big to fail. They will collect premiums on selling the product until it blows up. Crisis derivatives are yet another reason for many to scream for the reintroduction of Glass-Steagall, to separate banks from speculative trading.

I do not care if banks blow up providing that taxpayers do not have to bail them out. However, unless there is clear, distinct separation of banking from trading, such products heighten risk of another bailout.

The treasury (taxpayers) already guarantee $300 billion of Citigroup assets. We do not need more garbage or speculation on Citi’s balance sheet for taxpayers to underwrite. Nor do we need the derivative king, JPMorgan Chase, betting on systemic collapses.

I asked my friend “HB” to chime in on this product. He writes …

This is yet another example that shows fundamental conceit. Systemic risk is not lowered by the introduction of new derivatives, it is heightened. The risk doesn’t go away after all, it is just shifted.

Moreover, since derivatives need speculative participants to provide trading liquidity, they actually ADD to overall systemic risk.

That Citi would introduce such a product is a huge sign that the bottom is not in, and another huge crisis is coming.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.